Prince Harry’s lawyers failed to respect the embargo of an important judgment. Judge Swift scolded the Duke of Sussex’s lawyers, according to the Evening Standard article from March 24, 2022.
Prince Harry, 37, and his wife Meghan Markle, 40, were conspicuously absent from Tribute to Prince Philip. The Duke of Sussex defends the idea that her family cannot move around safely in the UK as they were stripped of police protection. This decision has never pleased the grandson of Queen Elizabeth II of England, 95 years old. He and his lawyers even believe thatthis is an illegal decision. Prince Harry, 37, had also proposed thathe is given police protection and in exchange, he was ready to pay. At the end of February 2022, this proposal from the husband of Meghan Markle was also refused by the High Court in Londonaccording The Sun.
Prince William’s brother, 39, not letting go, he then decides to file a complaint against the British government. On Thursday, March 24, 2022, Evening Standard reports that judge Swift gave a soap to the lawyers of the youngest son of Prince Charles and Lady Di for a story of court ruling leak. The court ruling in the Duke of Sussex’s case against the government was due be kept secret before it is made public. The embargo has no phave been respected by Prince Harry’s lawyers. “The judgment had been sent to former British Army Major General Tim Robinson. Mr. Robinson is an associate of Schillingsthe law firm that represents Prince Harry“, precise Evening Standard.
Judge Swift reprimanded Prince Harry’s lawyers
“It seems to me thatthere has been an embargo violation, the draft judgment should not have been provided to Mr. Robinson“, said the judge. The judge of the High Court of London believes that the situation is “totally unacceptable“. Moreover, because of this leak, he was waiting for an apology from the lawyers from Archie and Lilibet’s dad. “It is also unacceptable that you came here without apologizing“, he reminded Shaheed Fatima QC, Prince Harry’s lawyer.
The latter said that she and her team were not sure that sending the judgment to Mr. Robinson constituted a violation of the embargo. But after Judge Swift recalled, among other things, that Mr Robinson “is not legally qualified to provide legal services“Prince Harry’s lawyer has admitted malpractice.”I’m really sorry for not thinking well before sending the emails and for not having contacted the court sooner“, she said.
Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex But after Judge Swift recalled, among other things, that Mr. Robinson “is not qualified in law to provide legal services”, Prince Harry’s lawyer admitted his professional misconduct.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.